In class we reviewed our Syria overview packets and began The Confused Person’s Guide to the Syrian Civil War. Remember you have a current event on Syria due on Monday the 30th and a map quiz on Europe tomorrow.
Name __________________________
Summarize each section
of, “The Confused Person’s Guide to the Syrian Civil War.”
Overview:
What:
Who:
Where:
Why:
When:
Syria in 60 seconds:
The Confused Person’s
Guide to the Syrian Civil War
A
brief primer
Overview;
In
what French President Francois Hollande called “an act of war” against his
country, on November 13 several attackers staged a complex assault involving
shootings and suicide bombings in Paris that left 129 people dead. ISIS has
claimed responsibility, citing France’s participation in the “crusader
campaign” against the group. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was
unsympathetic, blaming French policy toward his country: “We said,
don’t take what is happening in Syria lightly. Unfortunately, European
officials did not listen.” France is one of 65 members of
the U.S.-led international coalition against the Islamic State, and one of eight that has conducted air strikes against
the group in Syria.
France’s
direct combat involvement in Syria is fairly recent; having enlisted in
international air strikes in Iraq last year, in September France joined a long
list of combatants in Syria’s civil war by bombing an ISIS training camp in the country. (David Graham has more here on France’s campaigns against ISIS and
its affiliates in Syria and elsewhere.) That participation seems destined to
expand; two days after the Paris attacks, France’s defense ministry announced
it was
conducting airstrikes against
the Islamic State’s de facto capital of Raqqa, Syria, and U.S. officials were
reportedly sharing intelligence
on ISIS targets with their French counterparts.
What?
Syria’s conflict has devolved from
peaceful protests against the government in 2011 to a violent insurgency that
has drawn in numerous other countries. It’s partly a civil war of government
against people; partly a religious war pitting Assad’s minority Alawite sect,
aligned with Shiite fighters from Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon, against Sunni
rebel groups; and increasingly a proxy war featuring
Russia and Iran against the United States and its allies. Whatever it is, it
has so far killed 220,000
people, displaced half
of the country’s population, and facilitated the rise of ISIS.
While a de-facto international
coalition—one that makes informal allies of Assad, the United States, Russia,
Iran, Turkey, the Kurds, and others—is focused on defeating ISIS in Syria, the
battlefield features numerous other overlapping conflicts. The Syrian war looks
different depending on which protagonists you focus on. Here are just a few
ways to look at it:
Who?
When we asked readers what they wanted to know about the
civil war, one asked: “Who are the various groups fighting in Syria? What
countries are involved?” By one count from 2013, 13 “major” rebel groups were operating in Syria; counting smaller ones, the
U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency puts the
number of groups at 1,200. Meanwhile, the number of other countries involved to
various degrees has grown; including the United States, nine countries have participated in U.S.-led
airstrikes against ISIS in Syria (though Canada’s newly elected prime minister has vowed to
end his country’s involvement in the military campaign); Russia is conducting its own bombing against ISIS and other rebel groups,
in coordination with ground operations by Iranian and Hezbollah fighters.
This is before you tally the dozens of countries whose citizens have traveled to join
ISIS and other armed groups in Syria.
Thomas
van Linge, the Dutch teenager who has gained renown for his detailed maps of the Syrian
conflict, groups the combatants into four broad categories: rebels (from
“moderate” to Islamist); loyalists (regime forces and their supporters);
Kurdish groups (who aren’t currently seeking to overthrow Assad, but have won
autonomy in northeastern Syria, which they have fought ISIS to protect); and
finally, foreign powers.
Many
of the parties I place in this last category are fighting or claiming to fight
ISIS. The divide among them is whether to explicitly aim to keep Assad in power
(Russia and Iran), or to maintain that he must go eventually while focusing on
the Islamic State at the moment (the U.S.-led coalition).
In
that sense, broadly speaking, Russia has intervened on behalf of the loyalists
and the United States has intervened on behalf of the rebels, though the U.S.
has tried to only help certain rebels, providing arms and training to
“vetted” groups. It’s this contradiction in U.S. goals—America wants Assad to
go but is also fighting ISIS, one of the strongest anti-Assad forces in Syria,
in defiance of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” principle—that helps answer
another reader’s question: “Why is it still so difficult to wrap my own head
around our official involvement in the conflict?” Russia’s approach is less
sensitive to the differences among rebel groups: It opposes all of them.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov summed it up at the United Nations earlier in
October: “If it looks like a terrorist, acts like a terrorist, and fights like
a terrorist, it’s a terrorist, right?”
Where?
What started in Syria has spread
to multiple countries—to Iraq, where ISIS has effectively erased part of the
border with Syria and taken over a chunk of the northwest; to Turkey and
Lebanon, which together have taken in more than 3 million of the 4 million
registered Syrian refugees; to Europe, which has
received more than
500,000 asylum applications from Syrians since 2011; and to the United States,
which as of this writing has resettled fewer than 2,000 Syrian refugees since
2011 but has pledged to take in 10,000 more over the next
year.
Why?
Why did Syria’s protests of 2011,
which began in part as a response to the arrest and
mistreatment of a group of young people accused of writing anti-Assad graffiti
in the southern city of Deraa, morph into today’s chaos? Or as one reader
asked: “What are they fighting about?” The protests started after two Arab
dictators, in Tunisia and Egypt, had already stepped down amid pro-democracy
demonstrations in their countries. Syria’s war is unique among the Arab Spring
uprisings, but it is not unique among civil wars generally. Stanford’s James
Fearon has argued that “civil wars often start due to
shocks to the relative power of political groups that have strong, pre-existing
policy disagreements. … War then follows as an effort to lock in … or forestall
the other side’s temporary advantage.” The Syrian uprising presented just such
a shock, and the opposition to Assad may have seen a short-term opportunity to
press for more gains by taking up arms before their Arab Spring advantage
disappeared. An International Crisis Group report from
2011 noted that Assad at first responded to protests by releasing some
political prisoners and instructing officials “to pay greater attention to
citizen complaints,” but that “the the regime acted as if each ... disturbance
was an isolated case requiring a pin-point reaction rather than part of a
national crisis that would only deepen short of radical change.”
Once a war starts, an awful logic often keeps it going,
according to Fearon: “Given enormous downside risk—wholesale murder by your
current enemies—genuine political and military power-sharing as an exit from
civil war is rarely seriously attempted and frequently breaks down when it has
been attempted.” Another complication: The
Atlantic’s Dominic Tierney, among others, has
argued that Assad
purposely radicalized the opposition to delegitimize the rebellion, by releasing
terrorists from prison and avoiding
fighting ISIS.
When?
To paraphrase one reader’s
question: When does this end? The political-science professor Barbara F. Walter has pointed out that since the end of World War II,
civil wars have lasted an average of 10 years, but that the number of factions
involved is likely to prolong this one. Ben Connable and Martin Libicki of the
Rand Corporation have meanwhile found that insurgencies tend to end when
outside state support is withdrawn, and that “inconsistent or partial support
to either side generally presages defeat.” With foreign involvement increasing
on both sides, neither is likely to win, or lose, anytime soon.
Syria in
60 Seconds:
Here’s how Andrew Tabler, an
expert on Syria at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, summarized
the conflict:
The Syrian Civil War is arguably
the worst humanitarian crisis since the Second World War, with over a quarter
million killed, roughly the same number wounded or missing, and half of Syria’s
22 million population displaced from their homes. But more than that, Syria
today is the largest battlefield and generator of Sunni-Shia sectarianism the
world has ever seen, with deep implications for the future boundaries of the
Middle East and the spread of terrorism.
What started as an attempt by the
regime of President Bashar al-Assad to shoot Syria’s largest uprising into submission
has devolved into a regionalized civil war that has partitioned the country
into three general areas in which U.S.-designated terrorist organizations are
dominant. In Syria’s more diverse west, the Alawite and minority-dominated
Assad regime, and a mosaic of Shia militias trained and funded by the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC), hold sway. In the center, Sunni moderate,
Islamist, and jihadist groups, such as ISIS and the al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat
al-Nusra, share control. And in the northeast, the Kurdish-based People’s
Protection Units (YPG) have united two of three cantons in a bid to expand
“Rojava”—Western Kurdistan. As the country has hemorrhaged people, neighboring
states have carved out spheres of influence often based on sectarian agendas
that tear at the fabric of Syrian society, with Iran (and now Russia) propping
up the Assad regime; Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the U.A.E.
supporting the Sunni-dominated opposition; and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PKK) supporting the YPG.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.